Panama Papers were the leaked huge stack of confidential
documents which were revealed by International Consortium of Investigative
Journalists (ICIJ) in 2016. It contains detailed information on 214,000 offshore
companies in a total of 11.5 million leaked documents processed in the law firm
since 1970s. It exposed the hidden overseas assets of politicians and elites
all over the world. After a comprehensive analysis by ICIJ, the company has
nearly one third of the business from its offices in Hong Kong and China. It
means China was the company's largest market while the office in Hong Kong was
the busiest business of the company.
1. Hong Kong Was Mossack Fonseca's Busiest Office
Over a nearly four-decade span, Mossack Fonseca worked with
more intermediaries – banks, law firms and others– in Hong Kong than in any
other jurisdiction. As of the end of 2015, 29 percent of the companies the law
firm was collecting fees for had been incorporated through offices in Hong Kong
and China. Hong Kong’s tax authority did not immediately respond to a request
for comment; A person answering the phone number for media at China’s tax
authority hung up when asked for comment.
2. A Number of Chinese Nationals Figure in the Reports
Chinese individuals and companies alarmed by a falling Yuan
and a crackdown on corruption have been on an increased push to move more of
their money outside of the country. A number of prominent Chinese – including
the brother-in-law of President Xi Jinping — were named in the leaked documents
as directors or shareholders of offshore companies, according to reports.
Chinese law doesn’t bar citizens from investing in offshore firms, but the
reports could increase cynicism about anti-corruption efforts.
3. Asia’s Biggest Property Developer Is Also in the Leaks
In 2012, Hong Kong-listed Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
allegedly asked Mossack Fonseca to dissolve a British Virgin Islands shell
company controlled by an executive who had recently been arrested as part of a
bribery investigation, according to a report in the British newspaper The
Guardian. Sun Hung Kai allegedly told Mossack Fonseca that the shell company
had no purpose, according to The Guardian.
The executive, Thomas Chan, was sentenced to six years in
prison in 2014 for acting as a bribery middleman between one of the property
developer’s top leaders, Thomas Kwok, and a senior Hong Kong official. In that trial, Mr. Kwok was also found guilty
of conspiracy connected with bribery and sentenced to five years.
4. China Laws Help Drive Hong Kong Offshore Activity
One of the reasons there are so many firms in Hong Kong
involved in setting up offshore trusts and companies is because of Chinese
citizens’ lack of trust in the country’s laws and courts, said Jason Sharman,
an offshore tax jurisdiction expert and professor at Australia’s Griffith
University.
Wealthy individuals who own property via an offshore company
could be doing so for legitimate reasons of privacy and security, or to skirt
China’s notoriously stiff restrictions on capital leaving the country, for
example.
Meanwhile, businesses may establish offshore holding
companies due to Chinese rules restricting foreign ownership in certain industries.
Chinese technology giant Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., which went public in New
York in 2014 in a record-beating $25 billion offering, is incorporated in the
Cayman Islands, for instance.
5. The Impact in Hong Kong Is Still Unclear
Although, Hong Kong is not an offshore tax haven and does not
allow anonymously held companies, the city has an independent legal system,
loose regulations and free capital flows, which makes it a key base for firms
and individuals that register companies in offshore tax havens.
Hong Kong has a large number of firms offering professional
services that help clients open and manage their offshore companies.
Professional and commercial support services is one of the four pillars of Hong
Kong’s economy, depends greatly on these offshore tax havens.
That is why a decline in the business of offshore tax havens
may have a serious impact on Hong Kong.
While the reports have had reverberations in some other
countries, such as Iceland, the impact in Hong Kong, if any, remains to be
seen.
Some Hong Kong officials have emphasized that Hong Kong is a
well-regulated financial center and dismissed concerns about money laundering,
according to local press reports.
As far as the risk of reputational harm, academics and
consultants stress there are many legitimate reasons to establish offshore
entities, and that Hong Kong doesn’t appear to have a bigger problem with
potential corruption than other major global financial centers.